Jump to content
GIGN Forum

Travian!


vincister
 Share

Recommended Posts

:)

revanšēšos vismaz par s1, kur viņam visu armiju iznīcināju :D

kā tev ar crop productionu?

Nu ja tu suuti es arii varetu kaut ko sagrabinaat :) Veel kads ir gatavs kaadus 300 aizsutiit ?

starp citu 118 kanals mircaa ir atpakal ?

Edited by bencik
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Vakardien atnaaca veestule, kaa jau lielaakaa dalja zina, mazliet ar vienu pakaroju.. Zaudeejumi minimaali + vel 0 bounty atdots.. Kaadi vinjam? apmeeram shaadi, visa armija izniicinaata, jo mans defence notureeja vinju, sagrauts ciems, bet ne liidz nullei, negribu savu toposho fermu nonest.. Veestules saturs zemaak, vieniigi varu pateikt.. Ir nozheelojami uzbrukt , tad suudzeeties ka vinju wingam ir alliance ar mums un tas it kaa esot nepieklaajiigi uzbrukt vinjiem...

Greetings

I am Gotmilk?, leader of the SCAR-CG alliance. I have just messaged your alliance leader pertaining to your attacks against my player cdr90. I understand how this game is played, but I also understand that once an ALLY/NAP has been agreed to that it is upheld in high regard. My wing brothers SCAR-CG have an ALLY with your alliance, and we share many of the same ALLY partners. I am not sure how your alliance views ALLY/NAP's but for us they cover all wings of SCAR-CG. Your attacks are in direct violation of this ALLY agreement and could put our ALLY into question. I understand we all make mistakes, and the game pushes us to do more, gain more, and win but do you really want to do so at the expense of an Alliance ALLY/NAP?

If my player cdr90 has in any way offended you I would like to know so I may address it with him and del out any alliance punishments that are found neccessary. I hope we can come to an diplomatic agreement to this situation so that we, as ALLY brothers can stand vitorious at end game!!

Gotmilk?

Co-Leader

SCAR-CG3

edited: repotus arii pielikshu

Uzbrukumi man:

http://s6.travian.com/berichte.php?id=9617463

http://s6.travian.com/berichte.php?id=9621017

http://s6.travian.com/berichte.php?id=9630091

http://s6.travian.com/berichte.php?id=9625508

Uzbrukumi vinjam:

http://s6.travian.com/berichte.php?id=9775560

http://s6.travian.com/berichte.php?id=9775554

http://s6.travian.com/berichte.php?id=9775547

http://s6.travian.com/berichte.php?id=9747775

http://s6.travian.com/berichte.php?id=9747767

http://s6.travian.com/berichte.php?id=9747765

http://s6.travian.com/berichte.php?id=9697193

http://s6.travian.com/berichte.php?id=9697189

http://s6.travian.com/berichte.php?id=9697183

http://s6.travian.com/berichte.php?id=9651963

http://s6.travian.com/berichte.php?id=9651958

http://s6.travian.com/berichte.php?id=9651953

http://s6.travian.com/berichte.php?id=9625212

http://s6.travian.com/berichte.php?id=9625206

http://s6.travian.com/berichte.php?id=9625204

http://s6.travian.com/berichte.php?id=9625187

p.s. bencik: 118 jau paaris dienas ir back

Edited by Teddy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

kāds atsūta kādus 500 phalanxus plis 3h laikā (ja var, ja nē, tad nē). Tikko, pirms kādām 3h man tika raidīts feik uzbrukums ar 1 catu, bet tagad seko vēlviens, no xambu, tāpēc, es, pēc savas loģikas spriežot, jūtu, ka tagad sekos armija plus catas (catas obligāti būs). pašlaik man ir ~200 phalanxi ar kapeikām, tāpēc, lūdzu, kāds steidzami atsūta def armiju.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

man jau tā ciems bija mazs :D. Bet man patīk šitas prikols. Ķipa es multy..... atvainojos kādas 4 reizes pēc pēdējās reizes viņš neko neatrakstīja nu tā nu es vairs negāju iekšā tajā acc jo domāju ka šis dusmīgs un banu neņems nost. Tāpēc es uztaisīju jaunu acc . Atkal mani nobanoja par multy acc.

Tad es uzrakstīju šādu vēstuli no jaunā acc:

men wtf???With my account bullet you dont answer.And now you ban this too.Ahh ok i will leave this game. bb

(Centos spēlēt uz jūtām :D)

Tad viņš atrakstīja šādu atbildi :

bullet account was unban for a loong time ago and now you made a new 1 and did a multi again

Pēc tam paskatījos un tiešām bija unbans. And that is my story :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Viens chiefs pazud pie parnemtaa ciema - bet suutit var arii trīs vienlaicīgi (maximums no viena ciema).

Kaa dabuut trīs cīfus no viena ciema????

Originally written by FANN

Well, answer is obvious: build palace to level 20 and then build three chiefs.

If you are wandering why is so important to have 3 chiefs in one place - important is to have more chiefs together because of easy takeovers (send main army together with rams, catas on residence and 3 chiefs in one single blow, then only one or two next second from other village or other player and finish the job). With only one or two chiefs per village you need much better coordination and new reinforcement can arrive in the middle, so this is minimizing the possible damage. This is especially nice for Romans - one blow and 75-90% loyalty down.

However, if you already founded/conquered one or two villages from that village (you didn't think or know before), you cannot do that. This happens to more then few players I think, and later in the game they want to have 3 chiefs in one stroke in the middle of the biggest possible army. First solution is obvious - build palace in new village, from which no villages was founded yet, but not many people will do that.

Second solution is to reconquer own village. Village you founded from attacking village need to be conquered by some other your village - this will make empty slot for new chief.

You need to destroy residence in that village (catas recommended) and send chiefs as usual, last one from any other village you choose. So you actually conquered village from yourself. You have to rebuild residence back as usual. Warning: you don't lost 10% of buildings and resource fields, but you loose wall completely and all researches in academy, blacksmith and armoury. (I did that today, so this is experience from first hand.) And any army built previously in that village is lost. So careful and see what villages you founded and need to reconquer. In same occasions it may be too painful.

Edited by vinituu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Taa luuk nu ii sanacis, kad FFH mani izjokoja un uztasiija forshu uzbrukumu Forshi, ne? :D, kaa rezultata esmu padirsi praktiski visu savu armiju(defense noteikti), no offens veel kaut kas ir palicis paari. Tachu neuztraucaties es rokas neemsu nolaidis, es tieshi esmu gatavs vinjus dauziit, un kaa veel... Tachu man ienaca ideja prata, kaa visa alianse varetu palidzeet cilvekam, kam iznicinata visa armija(es nedomaju, kad tev ir 100 phalanx un tev iznicina, bet labaks cipars, ka piem 800 :D ). VIsa alianse varetu sasutiit 1h ienakumus shim civlekam,blin stulbi, akd tas esmu es, padomas, kad veel gribu uzvariities :D Bet uzvariities man nav ne prataa, ka redzat padirsu kaut kur 300k resursos :lalala: Tas taads nedelas splaaviens vien ir. Ja katrs sasutitu 1h ienakumus, tas visamz nedaudz palidzeetu man atsakt kraat armiju. Es gribu dzirdeet juusu viedokli par sho jautajumu, lai nav taa kad pienemu leemumu vienpersoniski...

p.s. Un visiem noteitki atcereties(ieskaitot mani), nekad nemegini uzkert uzbrukumu, ja neesi 100 % parlieicnats. Ja redzi, kad tev naak virsu izrekini naak ar catas vai nee, ja nee, tad viss, suuti armiju projaam jo taa armija viena pati neko neizdariis. Savdaak sanaks tapat kaa man 800 padirst, jo biju 100% parlieicnats, kad naak feik uzbrukums. Luudzu atceraties sho !!!

un jaa man buus kluudas tekstaa, bet es tiko parrados no 30 h darba dienas, ta kaa nedirsh :)

Edited by bencik
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...