Angļu Valoda

[kept]

Man nevajag konkrēti vārds pa vārdam VISU tekstu, bet lai kāds kurš labi rubī..ierubītu kas tur ir..un īsumā pastāstītu..svarīgako tajā tekstā. Man ir svarīgi zināt tos skaidrojumus attiecīgi katrai figūrai..

p.s. iekrāsoto daļu nevajag.. nu var, ja nav slinkums..mosk es nepareizi esmu sapratis..

iemesls kāpēc netulkoju pats - visu dienu jau esmu nosēdejis ar visādiem citiem sesidarbiem un vnk enspeju uzfilmēt tekstu...

googles transleiterus nepiedāvāt

The relationship in Fig. 1. can be expressed as follows: The frames of reference of A and C overlap; the two communicators co-operate in achieving their communication roles and, in part, share the values underlying the communication roles and acts.

This version of the relationship is closer to what seems to happen in practice in such a relationship. The participants co-operate with each other and form a mutually agreed perception of their function. They have certain objectives in common, the one needing to get a particular story into a newspaper, the other needing to get news to satisfy and editor. The implication is that there will be some loss of independence by the C role, who should be acting as impartial agent of the public 'need to know'. Of the version as illustrated in Fig. 2. the authors say that 'The frame of reference for one communicator has been absorbed or otherwise taken over by the other; there is no distinction in role performance and values'. In principle, the model can accommodate a process of assimilation in either direction. It would be conceivable that a public official could supply information solely according to the demands and interests of the press. In reality, the pressure towards assimilation is nearly always in the other direction, since the supplier of information usually is in a stronger position in the relationship. The giving or withholding of news is more effective sanction in day-to-day affairs than the longer-term sanction of inadequate or unfavourable publicity. The research example on which the model is based supports such an interpretation. Assimilation also occurs when the goals of the press are identified with the goals of the society, as in many socialist societies, or in circumstances of totalitarian or autocratic control.

Edited January 9, 2011 by kept